1. Focuse(d) on the ball
2. Respect disagreement
3. Recognize change and development
4. Be willing to explain and elaborate
5. Separate what we know, what we believe, what we think
6. Respect expert knowledge
7. Put forward arguments
8. Answer rebuttals and critical questions properly
9. Present your point of view
10. Engage the voters
In Finland we are pretty fraking far from these ideals in the level and quality of our political talk, as can be viewed here (Denmark) , said by Taneli Tikka.
According to Tikka focus on the ball: we just had parliamentary elections in Finland. Did anybody notice any of the parties really giving any detailed answers and plans on how we are going to create the required 200.000 entirely new jobs to support the current state services during the next 9 years? I didn't. Most of the focus went into vague political rhetoric about taxing the rich (who's that exactly in a country where the upper quadrant income is one of the most modest ones in the EU) even more, and perhaps cutting way too little, way too late from government spending.
And on speculation whether or not it would be beneficial for Finland to bail out Portugal.
They say Point number 5 is brilliant: separating what we know (for an objective fact), what we believe (our interpretation of reality), and what we think (our conclusions and projections of these facts and interpretations) would indeed be extremely useful.
This is brilliant stuff, sure, if too much? As we know in education, if it´s line on with Montessori, Steiner, run to lot of materialistic facts suppressed the growing human being (´s head), but which is intended: that knowledge will come consciously and independently working later in life.
And it will be highlighted in similar communication, like number 5, is very useful if you are an executive, a startup CEO, scrum master, or anybody at all who needs to communicate between groups and teams of people who don't always observe the same facts and entirely agree on everything. This kind of 3 level separation gets people thinking more - and more than that, it gets them to commit to action more.
It also facilitates learning, Tikka said, okey.
Another suggestion by Monday Morning was same thing like that:
We need a new mindset in society:
From | To |
Economic politics | Innovation politics |
Political reforms | Organizational/institutional reforms |
Public solutions | Public-private partnerships |
Extra hands | New technology |
Bureaucratic leadership | Personal leadership |
General solidarity | Flexible solidarity |
One-size-fits-all | Customfit offers |
Tax financed welfare | Public-private financing |
Yes, as long as the Public-Private Financing does not mean
buns babe -policy and economic thinking, which is only based 'good will' by the richest income class.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar