 |
| Global temperature reconstruction for the past 10,000+ years. |
Can, or cannot.
I want to see more evidence, the real data, that we are creating this colossal change. Some of distorted algorithm is not sufficient.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report released to the public on Friday. The panel predicted that the Earth's climate will warm up up to five degrees if drastic, human-induced changes are not made to curb climate change.
Perhaps, but i think that we do not know all the factors that are affecting the development.
I want to know why, for example Jan van Rijckenborgh knew how to write a climate change in the first half of the last century ? (according to him, the reasons for the change are the cosmic).
According to University of Lapland the expectations on the standard of living in Asia, one the fastest growing populations in the world, are huge.
This, in their view, is one of the main challenges if greenhouse gases are to be reduced. They will say the IPCC climate change report may be optimistic.
University of Lapland refers to the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimate that in 2030 the human race will be even more dependent on fossil fuels than they are today.
I am quite sure that the world is no longer dependent on fossil fuels.
The IPCC, established by the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Meteorological Organisation in 1988, is supposed "the leading international body" for the assessment of climate change. but it´s the severely corrupted organization and to shore up their own power.
Now the IPCC is drawing up its Fifth Assessment Report, which will again be co-edited by the IPCC’s chair, Dr. Rajendra K. Pachauri of India. He is a railway engineer, by his basic training.
We love debate, after all science only drives under debate. We welcome it, as long as it's objective and well-intentioned, says Pachauri.
What it means "well-intentioned" in this context?
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar