Disclaimer

The six alternative theories are:
Bio-thermostat (rising temperatures and
 levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere
 trigger biological and chemical responses that have
 a cooling effect, like a natural thermostat),
Cloud formation and albedo (changes
 in the formation and albedo of clouds 
create negative feedbacks),
Human forcings besides greenhouse
 gases (mankind’s greatest influence on 
climate is not its greenhouse gas emissions,
 but its transformation of Earth’s surface by
 clearing forests, irrigating deserts, 
and building cities),
Ocean currents (global temperature variations
 over the past century-and-a- half and particularly
 the past 30 years were due to the slow-down 
of the ocean’s Thermohaline Circulation).
Planetary motion, .
Solar variability (changes in the brightness 
of the sun cause changes in cloud formation, ocean
 currents,  and wind that cause climate to change).

With money in itself is a question of moral, it can talk, sure. Money shall also in the EU, I would point out, `for a good cause´.
The new leak exposes how one of the foundation Heartland Institute works to undermine well-known climate science for the one truth.

There are claims that foundation keeps prominent sceptics on its payroll and relies on millions in funding from carbon industry, papers forward claims.
Heartland Institute claims fraud after leak of climate change documents – but identifies only one memo as fake. (and the rest of, if there's anything amazing?)
According the Guardian Heartland operates on a range of issues besides the environment. But discrediting the science of climate change remains a key mission. The group spends $300,000 on salaries for a team of experts working to undermine the findings of the UN climate body, the IPCC.
I did not get any cents.
I still think the truth is somewhere out of there.
I think that science cannot be a religion.
We have here in Finland, peat, this fuel became overnight the old-fashioned and also a part of `carbon industry´.

The Register – sure, a web magazin perhaps for promoting climate scepticism – is describing the leak as "at least as good as the 'Climategate' e-mails".
I don't know what that means.
.